The Supreme Court has done it again, sticking it to Montanans last week like it did to the Arizonans in 2010. SCOTUS stayed implementation of a 100 year old Montana law that prohibited corporations from spending money on political campaigns. 100 years. A century of Montana state legal precedent thrown out by the SCOTANS because … apparently they like how the political system has flourished under Citizens United and the resulting flood of corporate campaign spending.
The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) empanelled a number of lawyers and campaign finance experts last weekend to "celebrate Citizens United" - i.e., Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, the 2010 Supreme Court decision which makes it possible for corporations (and unions) to spend unlimited amounts of money from their treasuries on political campaigns. (I include unions parenthetically because, although media descriptions of the ruling almost always list “corporations and unions,” the truth is that unions are so outgunned that they may as well just keep their money.
Will African Americans Support Obama in 2012 ... or will they even be able to vote? See this article, which claims that blacks still hugely support President Obama for 2012, but that voter suppression legislation in 38 states may significantly diminish their access to the ballot and the power of their votes.
My Dad forwarded me a pretty funny email from a friend today. Since it relates at least tangentially to money in politics, I’ve included it below along with my response.
Watch this short, two minute, video of a 1924 speech by Senator Bob LaFollette. His speech is completely relevant to our times, in terms of the need for us to take individual responsibility to win back real representative democracy from the hands of a corporate / wealthy elite who actively use their resources to bend government to their purposes at the expense of us all.
In the continuing judicial erosion of campaign finance reform laws, a Florida federal judge has eliminated the matching funds provision in the Florida Election Campaign Finance Act. The ruling follows and models the June 27 Supreme Court decision declaring the matching funds provision of Arizona’s Clean Elections law unconstitutional.
The nice folks of the Friendship Fellowship at Pineda, the Unitarian Universalist Congregation on North US1 near the Pineda Causeway in Melbourne, invited me to be the guest speaker last Sunday, on the topic of public campaign financing.